Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed | ||
| Date: | Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:24:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38EXV3KVtVGd0m9zgye9cOMcWZCrbPzH-0CQhmHwZ14Z2g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina |
| 2 | <zerochaos@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > We already don't BUILD any new packages during update_seed. Originally |
| 4 | > we did, I encountered issues and fixed it in |
| 5 | > e7ea409acb52b43e9ea141c57201f9f87673f7ba to prevent building of packages |
| 6 | > during update_seed. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Right, I see. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | So, to make sure that I'm on the same page: is the the problem that |
| 11 | we're using stale packages in stage1 and if so, where did they come |
| 12 | from? A previous stage1 build that didn't do update-seed? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed | "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us> |
| Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Binary package dependencies and update_seed | "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o> |