1 |
On Friday 06 July 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
2 |
> Philipp Riegger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:45 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
> >>> I'm working on the GSoC project which aims at enabling gnap builds |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> on |
7 |
> >> |
8 |
> >>> non-x86 and which enables cross-compiling for gnap. I did not work |
9 |
> >>> that much on the last point so far, since i'd like to know what is |
10 |
> >>> already done, first. |
11 |
> >>> |
12 |
> >>> So... How's the status on this one? |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> What is the status of what? Cross-compiling? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > I was talking about the status of vapiers' cross compile patches for |
17 |
> > catalyst. I talked to him since and he said he would file a bug with the |
18 |
> > patches. Catalyst should be able to cross cmpile stage1 he said, only |
19 |
> > not all stage1 packages work with cross compilation. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > I'm still waiting for the bug. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Vapier's original cross-compilation patches to catalyst from 6 months or so |
24 |
> ago only added the foundation for cross-compiling and none of the guts, |
25 |
> afaict. He has been pretty busy lately, and none of the catalyst devs |
26 |
> really have any idea what he was intending or the time/inclination to work |
27 |
> on it ourselves. If you require catalyst cross-compiling functionality for |
28 |
> your SoC project, you'd better start working on it yourself or just give up |
29 |
> on your project :) |
30 |
|
31 |
what he's referring to is me dragging my feet |
32 |
-mike |