Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From:	Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To:	gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
Cc:	Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages
Date:	Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:57:43
Message-Id:	`CAEdQ38HMONw8zqv9FL2CuQrLdAz7bx8s3uBWG3c3XgXBimu3vg@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages by "W. Trevor King"

1	On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:30 AM, W. Trevor King <wking@×××××××.us> wrote:
2	> It would also have been nice if we'd
3	> caught the s/;/:/ typo in 462348d during ML review, but I didn't.
4
5	It would, yes, but it's expected that patches sent to the mailing list
6	have actually been tested. Doing otherwise (and not stating so) is
7	inexcusable. This has happened a number of times already.