Gentoo Archives: gentoo-catalyst

From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
To: gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:36:48
Message-Id: 20130419163632.GE32441@odin.tremily.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] [PATCH 0/2] Blacklisting binary packages by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina"
1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:32:14PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
2 > It may be a good idea to make this patch depend on your other
3 > patchset which fixes up some of the documentation and adding more
4 > detailed documentation....unless you already did that and I'm not
5 > paying attention.
6
7 That's a good idea. I'd be happy to rebase either series on top of
8 the other to flesh out the documentation, but I think I'll wait until
9 after one of them lands in master. This fix and the warning message
10 series seem fairly distinct to me, and having smaller patch series
11 seems easier to review.
12
13 If anyone out there is thinking “I would definately merge this stuff
14 if it was all in one big series instead of scattered about in topic
15 branches”, please tell me ;). I can certainly do that if y'all
16 prefer.
17
18 Cheers,
19 Trevor
20
21 --
22 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
23 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature