1.1

On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 04:51 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > >I think someone else should also have noticed this too.
> > 
> > Yes, we've noticed. However, releng doesn't build stage4 tarballs,
> > so we didn't care.
> 
> I care. Is b.g.o the right way to go?

Yes.

> > which we obviously don't support :)
> 
> Sure. It was a somewhat desperate attempt. A workaround might be to
> put a hacked glibc ebuild in my overlay, but I would like to avoid
> that upkeep in the long run.

Well, it needs to be fixed in the glibc ebuild, rather than catalyst.
File a bug against glibc and feel free to add catalyst@g.o to the
CC list, so we can watch/track the bug, also.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Developer
wolf31o2.org