Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > I'm having problems again with groupadd,
> > 
> > Maybe it's a problem with eutils.eclass? If it's inherited then it's
> > fair to expect that all it's functions will work. How to solve this
> > for user database changes that want to call programs in shadow?
> 
> there is no problem with eutils.eclass

Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is
intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available?

But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another
implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. If that's
a good idea, then where should that implementation go?


//Peter