1 |
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:31:57PM +0200, Giacomo Bagnoli wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 14:22 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
3 |
> > I've been trying to get clvm and lvm2 merged for years, but the |
4 |
> > clustering team seldom responds to my inquires. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > The latest bug is here: |
7 |
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/265671 |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > The differences between the two are very small at this point, because in |
10 |
> > the previous work, I rebased clvm off the lvm2 ebuild that was then |
11 |
> > current. |
12 |
> Well, the only thing I still don't understand is why clvm and cman use |
13 |
> flags are masked on amd64 profile. I've unmasked them (overriding the |
14 |
> profile) compiled deps, configured the cluster and it seems to work, |
15 |
> just curious if I'm going into troubles. |
16 |
Looks like it originated prior to 2007, and hasn't been removed at all, |
17 |
and instead migrated up to the global use.mask (and is reversed only for |
18 |
x86). |
19 |
|
20 |
cman and related packages are keyworded for amd64, so it should |
21 |
certainly be possible to remove the use.mask on amd64. Removing it for |
22 |
other architectures would require them to test cman and all the related |
23 |
packages first. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
28 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
29 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |