List Archive: gentoo-cluster
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-cluster:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Headers: |
|
To:
|
gentoo-cluster@g.o
|
|
From:
|
t35t0r <t35t0r@...>
|
|
Subject:
|
Why don't I get a performance increase with the linux bonding driver in balance-alb mode in a "local network" configuration?
|
|
Date:
|
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:40:28 -0600
|
|
I've got the following system:
Linux server 2.6.26 #5 SMP Fri Feb 6 12:18:54 CST 2009 ppc64 PPC970FX,
altivec supported RackMac3,1 GNU/Linux
Setup on a cisco gig switch with both gigabit NICs in the following setup:
% cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.2.5 (March 21, 2008)
Bonding Mode: adaptive load balancing
Primary Slave: None
Currently Active Slave: eth0
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0
Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:0d:93:9e:2b:ca
Slave Interface: eth1
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:0d:93:9e:2b:cb
Both eth0 and eth1 are running at 1000Mb/s full according to ethtool.
I start netserver (from netperf) on the server and then run netperf on
four other singlegigabit connected clients on the same switch with:
netperf -l 45 -t TCP_STREAM -H server
but I get the following outputs:
client 1:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 45.04 405.68
client 2:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 45.01 216.07
client 3:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 45.87 143.93
client 4:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 45.05 164.05
adding those up gives me:
$ echo "405.68+216.07+143.93+164.05" | bc -l
929.73
Not more than 1gbps. Shouldn't I be able to get >> 1gbps with balance-alb mode?
|
|