[gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/json-simple: metadata.xml

[PaweA Hajdan (phajdan.jr)]

phajdan.jr    12/03/31 17:02:25

  Modified:             metadata.xml
  Log:
  Add upstream remote-id annotations using tools by Corentin Chary, bug #406287.

Revision  Changes    Path
1.2                  dev-java/json-simple/metadata.xml

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-java/json-simple/metadata.xml?rev=1.2&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-java/json-simple/metadata.xml?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-java/json-simple/metadata.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Index: metadata.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-java/json-simple/metadata.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- metadata.xml	20 Apr 2008 14:33:15 -0000	1.1
+++ metadata.xml	31 Mar 2012 17:02:25 -0000	1.2
@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@
 <!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd">
 <pkgmetadata>
 	<herd>java</herd>
-	<longdescription lang="en">
-	Why the Simple Java toolkit (also named as JSON.simple) for JSON?
+	<longdescription lang="en">Why the Simple Java toolkit (also named as JSON.simple) for JSON?
 	When I use JSON as the data exchange format between the AJAX client and JSP
 	for the first time, what worry me mostly is how to encode Java strings and
 	numbers correctly in the server side so the AJAX client will receive a well
 	formed JSON data. When I looked into the 'JSON in Java' directory in JSON
 	website,I found that wrappers to JSONObject and JSONArray can be simpler,
-	due to the simplicity of JSON itself. So I wrote the JSON.simple package.
-	</longdescription>
+	due to the simplicity of JSON itself. So I wrote the JSON.simple package.</longdescription>
+	<upstream>
+		<remote-id type="google-code">json-simple</remote-id>
+	</upstream>
 </pkgmetadata>