[gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

[Joe Peterson (lavajoe)]

lavajoe     09/09/21 11:42:57

  Modified:             package.mask
  Log:
  Remove btrfs-9999 (ebuild has been removed)

Revision  Changes    Path
1.10482              profiles/package.mask

file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.10482&view=markup
plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.10482&content-type=text/plain
diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?r1=1.10481&r2=1.10482

Index: package.mask
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v
retrieving revision 1.10481
retrieving revision 1.10482
diff -u -r1.10481 -r1.10482
--- package.mask	21 Sep 2009 10:44:28 -0000	1.10481
+++ package.mask	21 Sep 2009 11:42:56 -0000	1.10482
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ####################################################################
-# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.10481 2009/09/21 10:44:28 robbat2 Exp $
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v 1.10482 2009/09/21 11:42:56 lavajoe Exp $
 #
 # When you add an entry to the top of this file, add your name, the date, and
 # an explanation of why something is getting masked. Please be extremely
@@ -1354,9 +1354,8 @@
 =dev-java/mx4j-3.0.2
 
 # Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o> (09 Jun 2008)
-# Live ebuilds too volatile for normal use.
-# User's who need to test these should unmask explicitly.
-=sys-fs/btrfs-9999
+# Live ebuild too volatile for normal use.
+# Users who need to test this should unmask explicitly.
 =sys-fs/btrfs-progs-9999
 
 # Rémi Cardona <remi@g.o> (27 May 2008)