Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:48
Message-Id: 20090311141327.11cc865d@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal by Luca Barbato
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:55:52 +0100
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
> The ebuild itself has some embedded information so portage > could/should provide something like. > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master > r12345]
That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought about this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most of it unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference implementation before promoting this idea any further. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies