From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal | ||
Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:48 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090311141327.11cc865d@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal by Luca Barbato |
1 | On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:55:52 +0100 |
2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > The ebuild itself has some embedded information so portage |
4 | > could/should provide something like. |
5 | > |
6 | > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master |
7 | > r12345] |
8 | |
9 | That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought about |
10 | this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most of it |
11 | unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference implementation |
12 | before promoting this idea any further. |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |