| 1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Just nudging y'all to see if there is any complaints w/ slipping a |
| 4 |
> few riders in w/ eapi3 (aka prefix). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> 1) punting AA |
| 7 |
> 2) punting KV and it's friends |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
We voted in the last council meeting that we won't put any additional |
| 10 |
features into EAPI 3. So I think that you need good arguments if you |
| 11 |
want us to revise that decision. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> 3) the fun one. mtime preservation (bug 264130). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
This is already included, see again December council meeting. |
| 16 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091207-summary.txt> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The only feature that I think is worth reconsidering: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
4) Support for unpacking .xz files |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It's an extension, therefore backwards compatible, and zmedico has |
| 23 |
already included it in Portage (EAPI=3_pre2 has it). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Should we have a vote per e-mail about the above (1, 2, and 4)? |
| 26 |
I think we should finalise the EAPI 3 feature list now and don't |
| 27 |
reiterate it at the next council meeting. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Ulrich |
Archives