1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:31:51 -0700
|
5 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> People keep asking us for action or a decision one way or the other, and |
8 |
> we can't seem to get enough of us saying the same thing at the same time |
9 |
> to do anything. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the |
12 |
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options |
13 |
> that have been mentioned: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I think this is the best choice because it conforms to policy and
|
19 |
shouldn't be all that disruptive.
|
20 |
|
21 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Why? I don't see what this gains, besides working contrary to policy
|
25 |
and possibly forcing two votes instead of one.
|
26 |
|
27 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
28 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council |
29 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
Except that's not what policy has as an option.
|
33 |
|
34 |
> 4) Something else. (What?) |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Which one do you prefer? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Thanks, |
39 |
> Donnie |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
Regards,
|
45 |
Ferris
|
46 |
- --
|
47 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
48 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
|
49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
50 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
|
51 |
|
52 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgzR7AACgkQQa6M3+I///dRxACgi+ZLqNln3AoNR0Q5vivAq8Hq
|
53 |
SzUAoII/aoUszipMGivMcQgMK9lA8Yhm
|
54 |
=o6sO
|
55 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
56 |
éí¢‡(ºw"–X¬¶ÈžÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |