1 |
I'd like to have a feedback about what we did and how all the devs took |
2 |
our decisions. All we got lately was a minority quite happy but not so |
3 |
vocal and a smaller minority not happy at all but quite vocal. |
4 |
|
5 |
So I see this issue as a good chance to know better in advance. |
6 |
|
7 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
8 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the |
9 |
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options |
10 |
> that have been mentioned: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
13 |
|
14 |
No problems with that route, having the election few month early won't |
15 |
change much. |
16 |
|
17 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; |
18 |
|
19 |
This is quicker, less time consuming so I like it better, overall we add |
20 |
one week, so it is good only to get some more done before the normal |
21 |
election. |
22 |
|
23 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
24 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council |
25 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
26 |
|
27 |
I'd like to have more feedback and avoid unnecessary clashes with people |
28 |
thinking otherwise, so not a good option. |
29 |
|
30 |
lu |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
|
34 |
Luca Barbato |
35 |
Gentoo Council Member |
36 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
37 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |