Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:07
Message-Id: 20090310143945.GA8976@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal by Thomas Anderson
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:26:39AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > > Thomas Anderson wrote: > That's not a technical objection in my opinion. That's an objection that > the doc doesn't go far enough, to which the answer is that it's the > first step. Just because the first step doesn't go as far as some would > like isn't a reason to take the first step.
Make that "isn't a reason not to take the first step". *sigh* -- --------- Thomas Anderson Gentoo Developer ///////// Areas of responsibility: AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council ---------