Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From:	Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>
To:	gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-council] Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:40:07
Message-Id:	`20090310143945.GA8976@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-council] Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal by Thomas Anderson

1	On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:00:03AM -0400, Thomas Anderson wrote:
2	> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:26:39AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
3	> > Thomas Anderson wrote:
4	> That's not a technical objection in my opinion. That's an objection that
5	> the doc doesn't go far enough, to which the answer is that it's the
6	> first step. Just because the first step doesn't go as far as some would
7	> like isn't a reason to take the first step.
8
9	Make that "isn't a reason not to take the first step". sigh
10
11	--
12	---------
13	Thomas Anderson
14	Gentoo Developer
15	/////////
16	Areas of responsibility:
17	AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
18	---------