| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>> Ah, I guess you're right. The documentation led me to believe that |
| 4 |
>>> os.utime would provide nanosecond-resolution on platforms that |
| 5 |
>>> support it, but a simple test case seems to indicate that it does not. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Is there an os.utimes in Python? utime(2) is marked as obsolete in |
| 8 |
>> POSIX.1-2008 (says the man page). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> There is no separate os.utimes function, but it looks like the patch |
| 11 |
> on this bug might make os.utime behave as desired: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> http://bugs.python.org/issue3425 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So let's declare it as a Python bug and include sub-second timestamps |
| 16 |
(where possible with the filesystem) in the spec? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Anyway, I see this as a very minor issue. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Ulrich |
Archives