Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Cc: tsunam@××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:08:10
Message-Id: 20090912160801.2d679976@snowcone
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting by Tobias Scherbaum
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:14:09 +0200
Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> wrote:
> 3. EAPI/PMS (30 Minutes) > > 3.1. A process to modify PMS standard that doesn't directly involve > the EAPI process. > As requested by "Joshua Jackson" <tsunam@××××××.org> / User > relations: Required people: tsuname, ulm > > "Per bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273261 I'm requesting > an AOB for the decision that was made by the PMS team about a process > or system to modify the PMS standard that doesn't directly involve > the EAPI process currently. > > I've set the hard date for them for the sept 10th meeting and this > gives them 3 weeks to work on this so it should be no issue for them > to come to this. I'm expecting them to be able to have a result by > then."
I asked Joshua to retract this request because he was basing it on the mistaken impression that profiles weren't EAPI controlled (the Council voted to put profiles under EAPI control a while ago). Unfortunately he hasn't responded, so instead I'll ask the Council to disregard this since between the EAPI mechanism and the way we've used previously of not introducing changes that will break older things (by not reusing names, and not requiring support except on EAPI change) we've already got the whole thing covered. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for September 14th meeting "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>