| 1 |
On 19:40 Sun 16 Nov , Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> Count me in as well for that idea. Having that "nobody" person running |
| 3 |
> in the election allows us to have a clear and comprehensible breakup |
| 4 |
> between those candidates who could easily fill a gap and those who don't |
| 5 |
> (and therefore when it's time to hold an election for a person filling |
| 6 |
> that gap). It still leaves one question open: What to do when "nobody" |
| 7 |
> is elected on the 5th or 6th position (or even the 1st ...)? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Have a smaller council. The largest number of odd people <=7 that are |
| 10 |
ranked above "nobody". There's no reason it has to be 7, and it seems to |
| 11 |
me that on a 7-person council, about half end up doing mostly nothing |
| 12 |
that's related to being on the council. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Thanks, |
| 16 |
Donnie |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 19 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 20 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives