1 |
On Friday 25 December 2009 09:00:36 Thomas Sachau wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/25/2009 06:10 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> >> I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a |
5 |
> >> thread at gentoo-dev ML: |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item: |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently |
10 |
> >> hardmasked and testing portage-2.2* for wider testing, more eyes looking |
11 |
> >> at it and hopefully more people helping improving it, so we can get a |
12 |
> >> version, which most can accept for PMS and maybe next EAPI. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Sorry, I forgot to send an email explaining what happened on the |
15 |
> > council alias as promised. The consensus was that the project wasn't |
16 |
> > mature enough to go ahead. Also more generally the council's job isn't |
17 |
> > discussing but deciding, approving, etc... Discussing is what should |
18 |
> > happen on mailing lists. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Since i see noone arguing against adding the multilib features to current |
21 |
> testing branch of portage, the discussion part already seems to be done. |
22 |
> so a simple approval is ok, drop the discussion request. |
23 |
|
24 |
that's incorrect. you still havent addressed my outstanding issues. until |
25 |
you do, i dont see how you can push for this being added to portage. or i |
26 |
missed some update along the way, but the last e-mail i see is from me dated |
27 |
26.10.2009 ... |
28 |
-mike |