1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Thomas Anderson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> Attached, comments are, as always, welcomed. Quite long this time. |
4 |
|
5 |
But you were quick nevertheless. :-) |
6 |
|
7 |
> - The banning of igli(Steve Long) from #gentoo-council. |
8 |
> [...] |
9 |
> No decision yet, the council decided to discuss this issue privately |
10 |
> on the council@ alias so that previous meeting time is not spent. |
11 |
^^^^^^^^ |
12 |
precious? |
13 |
|
14 |
> - Removal of Ciaran McCreesh's(ciaranm) bugzilla permissions. |
15 |
> [...] |
16 |
> Conclusion: |
17 |
> The council voted to reinstate Ciaran's editbugs privileges over the |
18 |
> strong protests of Ned Ludd(solar) who said it would |
19 |
> timestamp information for detecting who removed his privileges in |
20 |
> the first place and was against established infra process. |
21 |
|
22 |
Can you find a more neutral wording here? (From bug 273759 I conclude |
23 |
that robbat2 was successful with the investigation.) How about: |
24 |
|
25 |
"The council voted to reinstate Ciaran's editbugs privileges. Ned Ludd |
26 |
(solar) noted that infra will investigate who removed the privileges |
27 |
in the first place, and asks for not changing bugzilla status before." |
28 |
|
29 |
Ulrich |