| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Could you add in something like: |
| 4 |
> "Agree upon a wording for PMS for the mtime modification change |
| 5 |
> introduced to EAPI 3 last time" |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> I'd like council to discuss what I consider a major bug in PMS - |
| 9 |
> see the discussion at |
| 10 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-pms/msg_95a13d880eb521b13d7090f30350c26a.xml |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Could the both of you please flesh out a proposal on how you'd expect |
| 13 |
the council to solve these issues? It would best if, on top of telling |
| 14 |
what should be done, you explained why it should be done this way. |
| 15 |
Raising the questions is already interesting but proposing answers is |
| 16 |
even better. You may have done that elsewhere before but summarizing |
| 17 |
it here would help tremendously. And by the way those who know they |
| 18 |
will disagree with the above posters are welcome to make proposals of |
| 19 |
their own. It would be nice if we'd all get an opportunity to discuss |
| 20 |
it here before the council meeting. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Denis. |
Archives