Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
Cc: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o, zmedico@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:11:44
Message-Id: 49B46CD9.6050202@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009 by "Petteri Räty"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Petteri Räty wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Furthermore, why do I need to prod people for an update? When you commit >> to a date, you should be minimally sending out *something* on that date >> to let us know what is blocking progress. I don't enjoy acting like a >> mother hen, and I can't imagine it's terribly fun from the other end >> either. >> > > Zac promised me he would implemented the code into Portage but he hasn't > done it yet as far as I know.
I think I can get it done sometime this week. - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm0bNgACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMfVACgme62b4J65WvSq/URoXK55yea H+gAniG9s2qCsLBS8l3Vr1vUlsvOo/b8 =OZd5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----