Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:38:22
Message-Id: 1226943497.3939.2.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties by Ciaran McCreesh
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:40:43 +0100 > Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o> wrote: > > Count me in as well for that idea. Having that "nobody" person running > > in the election allows us to have a clear and comprehensible breakup > > between those candidates who could easily fill a gap and those who > > don't (and therefore when it's time to hold an election for a person > > filling that gap). It still leaves one question open: What to do when > > "nobody" is elected on the 5th or 6th position (or even the 1st ...)? > > The Debian nobody is called "reopen nominations".
Well, they elect 1 person, we elect 7 - with a nobody called "reopen nominations" it's compared to Debian more likely that we would run into a neverending election process ... Tobias

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Stepping back from council duties Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>