1 |
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 13:31 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> People keep asking us for action or a decision one way or the other, and |
3 |
> we can't seem to get enough of us saying the same thing at the same time |
4 |
> to do anything. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the |
7 |
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options |
8 |
> that have been mentioned: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; |
13 |
> |
14 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
15 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council |
16 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
17 |
|
18 |
#1 and #2 are stupid. |
19 |
#3 is the only option. |
20 |
|
21 |
It was a non-meeting. I noticed in one of your mails that somebody |
22 |
thought I was supposed to attend cuz I was proxying for vapier a few |
23 |
days before. It's ridiculias to assume that either one of us even knew |
24 |
there was a meeting. Plus.. Council already meet it's requirements for 1 |
25 |
open monthly meeting. |
26 |
|
27 |
So.. Don't be fooled. The foundation or anybody else can't force you do |
28 |
step down or hold new elections. Why? Cuz nobody did anything wrong. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
32 |
Gentoo Linux |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |