Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Chrissy Fullam <musikc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-council] RE: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 11 October 2007
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:25:13
Message-Id: 09EA41D0A8D249D8A3D6708C15ABD237@draco2
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Council meeting summary for 11 October 2007 by Donnie Berkholz
1 > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 >
3 > Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The
4 > complete log will show up at
5
6 <snip>
7 - The CoC is in effect, but it needs a new enforcement section since the
8 proctors were disbanded. The council is sending discussion of this to
9 the gentoo-project list, to come up with proposals for three points:
10 - who enforces it
11 - musikc said devrel could
12 - tsunam said userrel could
13 <snip>
14
15 I wanted to clarify, please understand the intent behind my part of the
16 conversation was that devrel and userrel should continue to share the
17 responsibility as appropriate, and continue to work together, including the
18 questionable/overlapping areas. The above may have been misinterpreted by
19 some to indicate 'pick which one', when my intent was a joined front on
20 enforcing the CoC.
21
22 Kind regards,
23 Christina Fullam
24 Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations
25
26
27 --
28 gentoo-council@g.o mailing list