1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2009.01.13 21:45, Ned Ludd wrote: |
5 |
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:03 +0000, Roy Bamford wrote: |
6 |
[snip] |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > Tiziano, |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I would like to widen the discussion a little. |
11 |
> > I propose that council members serve for two years, not the current |
12 |
> > year and that half the seats are contested every year. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> You raised some good points here. But I don't think two years helps |
15 |
> anybody at all. Here are some of the reasons why. |
16 |
> |
17 |
[snip] |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I'm in favor of 1 year terms for council. Trustees on the other |
20 |
> hand.. |
21 |
> 2 |
22 |
> years would be nice as the first few months seems to be spent sorting |
23 |
> out stuff from the previous set (paper work etc..) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
27 |
> Gentoo Linux |
28 |
> |
29 |
Ned, |
30 |
|
31 |
I'm not hung up on the term, I would like to see staggered terms to |
32 |
ensure there is a continuity. A one year term means elections every six |
33 |
months. |
34 |
|
35 |
- -- |
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
|
38 |
Roy Bamford |
39 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
40 |
gentoo-ops |
41 |
forum-mods |
42 |
treecleaners |
43 |
trustees |
44 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
45 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
46 |
|
47 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkltFdcACgkQTE4/y7nJvauJJACfelS9H05fbc5rqQXQ50cGXVPR |
48 |
Ri4AoI4964BA2iK+ywJX5jKO0LSYjrC/ |
49 |
=e/JY |
50 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |