1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Chrissy Fullam wrote: |
5 |
|> Can people be entirely banned from Gentoo? |
6 |
| |
7 |
| By technical merit I'd not say that anything is entirely outside of |
8 |
| technical ability if one has that ability to circumvent the system. |
9 |
Doesn't |
10 |
| mean we should throw the towel in and just sit back to take abuse though. |
11 |
| |
12 |
|> - What would such a ban include? Some ideas -- the person could not: |
13 |
|> - Post to any gentoo mailing list; |
14 |
|> - Post to gentoo bugzilla; |
15 |
|> - Participate in #gentoo- IRC channels; |
16 |
|> - Contribute to gentoo (hence my corner case of a security fix) except |
17 |
|> perhaps through a proxy; |
18 |
| |
19 |
| Mailing list rights and bugzilla rights for that email address would be |
20 |
[snip] |
21 |
Not to pick on you musikc, but can we all stop using the term 'rights' |
22 |
please. Regarding anything the infrastructure team provides, the proper |
23 |
term is privilege. |
24 |
|
25 |
TIA |
26 |
|
27 |
- -- |
28 |
======================================================= |
29 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
30 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
32 |
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 |
33 |
======================================================= |
34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
36 |
|
37 |
iJwEAQECAAYFAkh9YtAACgkQgGui5Bn0rgUR6AP/XQGPbymLZhZ53qmK8oU3SauG |
38 |
BI3OC7jQ1CMUr2HLUNvSYDO8q/PIu9PKO9/AjBA7EEEtRtmt2ic6lWAS/+JfcPsE |
39 |
TCYWs7kV+xpPmQRPziTR1Vz6lsV+3t+M6V/0Kl2UcWp2M/tvc+yLIHN+TfOiq4Xj |
40 |
oI8+r3Hu012kD1a/yOQ= |
41 |
=+kRN |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |