1 |
On 16:42 Thu 08 Nov , Wernfried Haas wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:05:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
3 |
> > All this team's actions must be approved by the lead within a short time |
4 |
> > period or must be reverted. It's expected that many actions will range |
5 |
> > from 6-12 hours, so 12 hours seems like a reasonable time to require |
6 |
> > lead approval. Whenever the lead is unavailable, approval falls to the |
7 |
> > council. (Remember, two council members together can make decisions.) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I like the spirit, but I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice. |
10 |
> In any case, they should be documented (e.g. sent to some private list |
11 |
> where the lead and council can see it). |
12 |
|
13 |
I agree that it would be infeasible if this were a regular occurrence. |
14 |
My and Ferris's expectations were that it would be fairly rare, but we |
15 |
don't have much real-world data to bear that out. Could you share some |
16 |
from your experience with the original proctors? |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Donnie |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-council@g.o mailing list |