1 |
* Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>: |
2 |
> On R, 2008-11-28 at 18:55 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
3 |
> > I would like to nominate Mart Raudsepp (leio@g.o). |
4 |
> |
5 |
> After investigating on the reasons of why this is an election instead of |
6 |
> picking the next in line, I found out that is so because the correction |
7 |
> to GLEP39 decided says that to be the procedure: |
8 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070208-summary.txt |
9 |
> The acceptance didn't seem to be unanimous due to some council members |
10 |
> preferring an election to be hold for the spot, therefore an election is |
11 |
> held. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In that spirit, as the second in line based on the full election in |
14 |
> summer, I accept the nomination with the same platform[1] except for the |
15 |
> last three lines talking about GUADEC, as they are obviously out of date |
16 |
> now. |
17 |
|
18 |
You will soon find this in the meeting logs: |
19 |
|
20 |
20:25 <@dberkholz> |
21 |
i'm not opposed to dev-zero per se, but i think we've already gone too far |
22 |
down the list. as i mentioned on the -council mailing list, more people |
23 |
would have nominated themselves had they thought that not enough good |
24 |
potential members were already there. |
25 |
[...] |
26 |
20:30 <@dertobi123> |
27 |
dberkholz: *shrugs* ... we're still in the upper half of the list, |
28 |
compared with the 2007 list i don't get where we're going to go too far |
29 |
down. |
30 |
[...] |
31 |
20:32 <@dberkholz> |
32 |
dertobi123: you can also consider this a test of the voting system to |
33 |
actually get things done fast enough so it doesn't delay council activity |
34 |
at all. |
35 |
[...] |
36 |
20:33 <@dertobi123> |
37 |
dberkholz: i could, but i don't see why we shouldn't follow the steps |
38 |
which worked in the past few years |
39 |
[...] |
40 |
20:34 <@dberkholz> |
41 |
dertobi123: because 5 of the council members would rather do something |
42 |
else. =) |