| 1 |
On 22:18 Fri 06 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:12:29 -0800 |
| 3 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I agree that splitting president and secretary into separate roles is |
| 5 |
> > a great idea. I feel strongly that rotating these positions often |
| 6 |
> > will result in both roles being ineffective, because it takes time to |
| 7 |
> > get even decent at either of them. Does anyone want to return to the |
| 8 |
> > 4-hour meetings we used to have? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Does returning to 4-hour meetings mean things will no longer keep on |
| 11 |
> getting postponed for 'further discussion' that will never happen |
| 12 |
> because the meeting ran one second over its allocated time? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If they never happen, apparently the people desiring discussion don't |
| 15 |
care enough to continue bringing it up on the list ... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
Donnie |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 22 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives