| 1 |
On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare |
| 4 |
> > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply |
| 5 |
> > to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder |
| 6 |
> > approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a |
| 7 |
> > message about the two topics which did not make it last time and |
| 8 |
> > explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you |
| 9 |
> > know... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of |
| 12 |
> -dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following |
| 13 |
> behaviour such that I: |
| 14 |
> - don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times |
| 15 |
> - don't get lost where the mail is/was |
| 16 |
> - get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another |
| 17 |
> list |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
get a sane mail client that automatically handles messages with duplicate ids |
| 20 |
and references. cant say ive ever noticed a problem with kmail. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives