| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:20:34 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Live template provide correct ordering since generates ebuilds with a |
| 5 |
>> proper version. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> *sigh* Please stop pushing your epic fail of a non-solution until you |
| 8 |
> understand the issue at hand. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
go back to 4chan. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> There is no way of using conventional version rules to accurately |
| 13 |
> represent scm versions across multiple version-branches. _pre does not |
| 14 |
> order correctly, since you don't know what the next release will be, |
| 15 |
> and it collides with upstream release names. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
pre works perfectly fine with snapshots. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
you cannot track separate branches/versions w/out the very same issues |
| 20 |
you have merging separate versions of normal packages, and glep54 |
| 21 |
doesn't say anything about how it should track multiple branches in any |
| 22 |
different way than the current version components. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
lu |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Luca Barbato |
| 29 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 30 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 31 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives