1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:20:25 +0100 |
3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>>> [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master |
5 |
>>>> r12345] |
6 |
>>> That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought |
7 |
>>> about this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most |
8 |
>>> of it unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference |
9 |
>>> implementation before promoting this idea any further. |
10 |
>> What's wrong is U that should be R beside that there isn't much |
11 |
>> magic... |
12 |
> |
13 |
> The U isn't the problem. The svn revision is the problem. You need to |
14 |
> consider how the package manager would get the revision. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
I know, if you are re emerging you have those information, if you are |
18 |
updating you won't have them. That's why either the U or the revision |
19 |
information is wrong. |
20 |
|
21 |
lu |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
|
25 |
Luca Barbato |
26 |
Gentoo Council Member |
27 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
28 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |