| 1 |
> People keep asking us for action or a decision one way or the other, and |
| 2 |
> we can't seem to get enough of us saying the same thing at the same time |
| 3 |
> to do anything. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from the |
| 6 |
> council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some options |
| 7 |
> that have been mentioned: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> 1) Have an election now; |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> 2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have elections; |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these |
| 14 |
> reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a council |
| 15 |
> majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> 4) Something else. (What?) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I don't know the relevance of my opinion on this topic but what the heck. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
1 = lame |
| 22 |
2 = less lame |
| 23 |
3 = least lame |
| 24 |
4 = cant comment on non-existence so how about no? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Seriously, this wasn't advertised enough, the decision for the meeting IIRC |
| 27 |
was made at the tail end of your regular meeting and continued even when |
| 28 |
other Council members had already left. I do wish more, if not most, of you |
| 29 |
showed for the meeting but I cant hold it against you when it was announced |
| 30 |
the way it was (end of meeting and via logs about a meeting you had attended |
| 31 |
so why would you read them). |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I think voting you guys out would be lame. I like that word regarding this |
| 34 |
topic. :) I personally will vote for each of you again should you choose to |
| 35 |
run in the next election. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Regarding that #!$$#@% about Trustees trying to take over control of |
| 38 |
Council, you really don't even want to get me started on my thoughts at that |
| 39 |
but expletive expletive expletive should cover that nicely. It is sooo not |
| 40 |
what the Trustees were voted in to do, that being to handle many legal and |
| 41 |
non-technical matters. If ever there would be a reason for developers to |
| 42 |
quit, I would cite that as a prime candidate. Sorry, to my knowledge we |
| 43 |
didn't ask for a take over. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Kind regards, |
| 47 |
Christina Fullam |
| 48 |
Gentoo member of stuff but speaking her own mind in case it offends some |
| 49 |
people on this list. ;-) |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-- |
| 55 |
gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives