| 1 |
On Friday 11 December 2009 12:43:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:34:09 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 |
> > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > >> We can considerably shorten this discussion, because it boils down |
| 5 |
> > >> to the following: PMS is an official Gentoo document, and therefore |
| 6 |
> > >> it's not upon you to make this decision. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Alright. We'll escalate this to the Council then. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > No need for that, as it has already been voted on in the 2008-04-10 |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > council meeting (repeating it, as you've added gentoo-council to CC): |
| 13 |
> > | The council voted that kdebuild-1 and other unapproved EAPIs could |
| 14 |
> > | not be in an approved PMS document. The spec isn't a place for |
| 15 |
> > | proposals or things that will never be submitted for approval by the |
| 16 |
> > | council. It's a specification, a reference of what is allowed in the |
| 17 |
> > | main tree. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And the resolution for that was to make it possible to disable |
| 20 |
> kdebuild-1. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
you were told multiple times that it doesnt belong in the master branch and |
| 23 |
that it should be deleted. if you actually wanted to retain it, you could |
| 24 |
easily create a kdebuild-1 branch. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> That is not the same as deleting it while there are still |
| 27 |
> users who have kdebuild-1 packages installed. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
the only people who have such packages installed were using an unapproved spec |
| 30 |
with unofficial package managers. as such, it is their problem to continue to |
| 31 |
support the crap and this argument is bunk. |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives