| 1 |
On 2009.10.09 22:32, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 21:56 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2009.10.09 21:13, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > 1. Discuss why follow up for items from last meeting never |
| 5 |
> happened. |
| 6 |
> > > Should we do something to ensure this doesn't happen again? |
| 7 |
> > [snip] |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Team, |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Yes, it needs to be fixed. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Fixed? |
| 15 |
> Actually it seems the council is split on if PMS was even worth |
| 16 |
> keeping |
| 17 |
> around. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 22 |
> Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
Ned, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I think we are talking at cross purposes. The general problem of |
| 27 |
actions from the last meeting not being followed up and/or lost needs |
| 28 |
to be fixed. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
PMS is one example of that general problem, which I was commenting on. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Roy Bamford |
| 36 |
(Neddyseagoon) an member of |
| 37 |
gentoo-ops |
| 38 |
forum-mods |
| 39 |
trustees |
Archives