1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 01 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I am charge of creating the agenda for the October meeting. Silly me |
4 |
> for thinking that it would involve acting in October as there's now |
5 |
> under two weeks to the meeting. Anyway please submit your items by |
6 |
> replying to this mail. |
7 |
|
8 |
1. I'd like to see a short progress report on EAPI 3 implementation |
9 |
in Portage. |
10 |
|
11 |
2. In case that the above isn't very close to a release, I ask the |
12 |
council to vote on the following: |
13 |
|
14 |
EAPI 3 is reopened for the purpose of including one sole feature, |
15 |
namely preservation of file modification times, as outlined in |
16 |
bug 264130, option B of comment 26 [1]. Both Portage and Pkgcore |
17 |
already comply with this, so it would be zero implementation cost. |
18 |
|
19 |
Ulrich |
20 |
|
21 |
[1] <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264130#c26> |