Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Cc: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:45:59
Message-Id: 1203021957l.5905l.2l@spike
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement by Donnie Berkholz
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2008.02.14 20:08, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
5 > On 12:03 Thu 14 Feb , Ned Ludd wrote:
6
7 > >
8 > > Umm so yeah. That's still more or less what proctors role was. I'm
9 > > sure you can get that very same group of people to help out here.
10 >
11 > My hope is that with no team of people assigned to doing this stuff,
12 > we
13 > can actually build a culture and get more people participating rather
14 > than having "the people who do that stuff" and everyone else.
15 >
16 > Thanks,
17 > Donnie
18 > --
19 > gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list
20 >
21
22 Donnie,
23
24 The cynic in me sees the secret-proctors project taking shape.
25
26 I have a great deal of empathy with the ideal. However, its better if
27 these 'stop being a dickhead' messages come privately from a respected
28 college than from a comparative stranger.
29
30 Gentoo is big enough now so that many devs never work/speak with one
31 another, which is a part of the problem you are trying to address here.
32
33 I don't think we need a group to do this - we already have one. The
34 developer pool, we need to raise awareness. It needs publicity to
35 encourage everyone to participate, something like a 'don't be a
36 dickhead day'.
37
38
39 Ned,
40
41 I think very few ex-proctors would be jumping in for a second helping
42 after the way they were supported by the council that created them.
43
44 - --
45 Regards,
46
47 Roy Bamford
48 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
49 gentoo-ops
50 forum-mods
51 treecleaners
52
53 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
54 Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
55
56 iD8DBQFHtKiFTE4/y7nJvasRApfMAKDlB0V2WKnt07QtheFXHTO8Twnf2gCfR3eT
57 C+aNli8dtZZF+kvw3+/GCAE=
58 =2R4N
59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
60
61 --
62 gentoo-council@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-council] CoC: informal enforcement Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>