1 |
On Sunday, July 18, 2010 15:51:11 Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/18/2010 10:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:20:57 Petteri Räty wrote: |
4 |
> >> On 07/18/2010 07:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> >>> On Saturday, July 17, 2010 23:47:39 Alex Alexander wrote: |
6 |
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:22AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. wrote: |
7 |
> >>>>> I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls |
8 |
> >>>>> as Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. |
9 |
> >>>>> Which ML do we want to use? |
10 |
> >>>> |
11 |
> >>>> IMO we should be using gentoo-council@lists.g.o for this. |
12 |
> >>>> Afterall, we are talking about the Council meeting agenda. |
13 |
> >>>> |
14 |
> >>>> Any topic that needs further discussion before a meeting should be |
15 |
> >>>> moved to its own -dev thread anyway. |
16 |
> >>> |
17 |
> >>> reality is that this probably wont work in practice. cc-ing both lists |
18 |
> >>> isnt a problem and lets devs know that the council is indeed doing |
19 |
> >>> work. |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> >> Cross posting is annoying if you are on both lists and can lead to the |
22 |
> >> fragmentation of the thread. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > get a real mail client then. any modern one worth using handles |
25 |
> > duplicate mail ids just fine. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Yes the first can be worked around (although archives still have |
28 |
> multiple copies). The second is a worse problem in my opinion. The |
29 |
> current rules are not to cross post. If you are not happy with them you |
30 |
> should start a thread on changing them. |
31 |
|
32 |
there was a debate on the issue, but there was never a clear edict on it. so |
33 |
dont quote the situation as if there was. |
34 |
-mike |