1 |
* Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>: |
2 |
> Since Cardoe was the last person from the council vote with a |
3 |
> distribution that's anywhere between "more positive than negative" and |
4 |
> "even", I suggest that we leave the remaining spot open rather than |
5 |
> filling it with someone who the majority of developers ranked in the |
6 |
> bottom half of candidates. |
7 |
|
8 |
The "bottom half" depends somehow on the number of candidates. |
9 |
|
10 |
This is the ranked list: |
11 |
| 1 dberkholz |
12 |
| 2 Halcy0n |
13 |
| 3 Flameeyes |
14 |
| 4 Betelgeuse |
15 |
| 5 lu_zero |
16 |
| 6 Jokey |
17 |
| 7 dertobi123 |
18 |
| 8 cardoe |
19 |
| 9 dev-zero |
20 |
| 10 leio |
21 |
| 11 welp |
22 |
| 12 fmccor |
23 |
| 13 ulm |
24 |
| 14 jer |
25 |
| 15 hkBst |
26 |
| 16 astinus |
27 |
| 17 ferdy peper |
28 |
| 18 zlin |
29 |
|
30 |
What is the bottom half? |
31 |
|
32 |
By ranks: |
33 |
1-9 is the first half, and 10-18 the second. |
34 |
|
35 |
Or did you already remove rank 18? |
36 |
|
37 |
| * Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is |
38 |
| irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then |
39 |
| the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the |
40 |
| position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so |
41 |
| forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new |
42 |
| person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly |
43 |
| elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that |
44 |
| person, then a new election is held to choose a new member. |
45 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070208-summary.txt> |
46 |
|
47 |
So your options are: |
48 |
- Change the rules once again. Because you can. |
49 |
- Follow the rules. |