Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:29:17
Message-Id: 19152.53882.243649.730194@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 by Ciaran McCreesh
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Different Portage versions do different things with mtimes,
From bug 181021 I conclude that Portage preserves timestamps since version 2.1.2.10, and 2.1.2.11 went stable in August 2007. That's more than two years ago.
> so currently ebuilds can't rely upon any particular behaviour.
Show me _one_ user who is still using an older Portage version (together with a current tree). ;-) Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for October meeting next Monday 2009-10-12 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>