Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>
Cc: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>, gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Bans in #-council [WAS] Council meeting summary for meeting on June 11, 2009
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:36:46
Message-Id: 20090622163644.GA27178@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: Bans in #-council [WAS] Council meeting summary for meeting on June 11, 2009 by Doug Goldstein
1 On 23:35 Fri 19 Jun , Doug Goldstein wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Donnie Berkholz<dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On 12:06 Wed 17 Jun     , Thomas Anderson wrote:
4 > >> The ban was later reversed by Doug Goldstein(Cardoe) because it had
5 > >> not been put to a council vote as all bans in #-council are.
6 > >
7 > > Since when? I've never heard of this. I've banned people in there with a
8 > > note to other council members (for the simple sake of good
9 > > communication) and no vote ever happened except by lack of objection.
10 >
11 > In the past you've e-mailed all of us and told us about the situation
12 > and the rest of us agreed with your action. In this case, there was no
13 > e-mail and more then half of the council members didn't see
14 > justification for the ban based on the conversation at hand. While
15 > some of the comments at hand were snide, a lot of the confusion was as
16 > a result of the language barrier. I know the language barrier has
17 > caused a problem for some of us one time or another. In fact, dev-zero
18 > and I have had our share of disagreements as a result of the language
19 > barrier. At the same time, dev-zero and I have worked together on
20 > quite a few projects and had positive experiences together. We decided
21 > in the meeting to let emotions cool and toss it to e-mail. If anyone
22 > wanted to see igli banned, to send an e-mail to all the council
23 > members (it didn't even have to be on the ML) and we'd go from there.
24 > To date, no such e-mail has come. The only e-mails are just throwing
25 > fuel on a fire which no longer exists.
26
27 Thanks for the clarification. My problem is just with the wording in the
28 summary, then, as it implies that banning can't happen until *after* a
29 vote.
30
31 --
32 Thanks,
33 Donnie
34
35 Donnie Berkholz
36 Developer, Gentoo Linux
37 Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com