Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Subject: Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 23:19:30 -0800
On 19:19 Mon 02 Mar     , Thomas Anderson wrote:
>     - GLEP 55
>         There had been quite a bit of discussion on this topic recently.
>         Within hours of the council meeting new proposals were being proposed
>         and discussion was ongoing. 
> 
>         Conclusion:
>             No decision as of yet. Ciaran Mccreesh(ciaranm) and Zac
>             Medico(zmedico) volunteered to benchmark the various proposals on
>             the package managers they maintain(paludis and portage
>             respectively. Petteri(Betelgeuse) will assist with the portage
> 	    benchmarks. Tiziano(dev-zero) and Alec Warner(antarus) will write
>             up a comparison of the various proposals and their various
>             advantages and disadvantages within a week.
>
>     - GLEP 54
>         There had been some discussion on gentoo-dev since last meeting,
>         though no consensus or agreement had been reached(surprise!)
> 
>         Conclusion:
>             Thomas Anderson(tanderson) and Luca Barbato(lu_zero) will write up
>             a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two
>             proposals(-scm and _live). This will be completed within a week.

What is the status of both of these? If they aren't done yet, why not, 
what needs to happen, and who needs to do it?

Furthermore, why do I need to prod people for an update? When you commit 
to a date, you should be minimally sending out *something* on that date 
to let us know what is blocking progress. I don't enjoy acting like a 
mother hen, and I can't imagine it's terribly fun from the other end 
either.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Attachment:
pgpqm8PLd5EtJ.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
-- Petteri R├Ąty
Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
-- Luca Barbato
Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
-- Nirbheek Chauhan
References:
Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
-- Thomas Anderson
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
Next by thread:
Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009
Previous by date:
Reminder for Thursday's meeting
Next by date:
Re: GLEP 54/55 updates [WAS] Council Meeting summary for 26 February 2009


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.