List Archive: gentoo-council
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> 3. Preservation of file modification times
>> - ulm asked us to vote on it if EAPI 3 is not close to release
>> - from the agenda thread there doesn't seem to be a consensus
>> among PM developers on how to best approach this
> Actually, my request was more explicit:
> If the council accepts mtime preservation, decide which option it
> should be, as outlined in bug 264130 comment 26 :
> A: current Portage and Pkgcore behaviour, all mtimes are preserved
> B: optional update of "old" mtimes
> C: mandatory update
> Could you add this to the agenda please?
I'd just ask portage devs what is their take and go with it.
Gentoo Council Member