Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>, gentoo-council@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: mtime preservation | ||
| Date: | Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:11:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 19186.27811.661514.383226@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-council] Re: mtime preservation by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Ah, I guess you're right. The documentation led me to believe that |
| 4 | > os.utime would provide nanosecond-resolution on platforms that |
| 5 | > support it, but a simple test case seems to indicate that it does not. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Is there an os.utimes in Python? utime(2) is marked as obsolete in |
| 8 | POSIX.1-2008 (says the man page). |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-council] Re: mtime preservation | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |