Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:27 +0000
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:55:52 +0100
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
> The ebuild itself has some embedded information so portage
> could/should provide something like.
> 
> [ebuild     U ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0_pre20090310 [from svn master
> r12345]

That claim right there is enough to show that you haven't thought about
this at all. Your proposal is lots of handwaving magic, most of it
unimplementable. I suggest you put together a reference implementation
before promoting this idea any further.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Luca Barbato
References:
Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Ryan Hill
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
-- Luca Barbato
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal
Next by date:
Re: Re: Comparison of GLEP 54 and 'live ebuild' proposal


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-council mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.