1 |
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:18 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:11:19 +0100 |
3 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > > [...] kdebuild-1 needs to remain so long as package managers |
6 |
> > > support it. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > We can considerably shorten this discussion, because it boils down to |
9 |
> > the following: PMS is an official Gentoo document, and therefore it's |
10 |
> > not upon you to make this decision. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Alright. We'll escalate this to the Council then. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Council: please vote on the following at the next meeting: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> "kdebuild-1 to be kept in PMS as-is until we're reasonably sure that no |
17 |
> users have installed packages that use kdebuild-1. Since kdebuild-1 is |
18 |
> no longer actively used for installable packages, when time permits, and |
19 |
> to fit in with the normal release cycle, the Paludis team shall take |
20 |
> steps to notify users who do have installed kdebuild-1 packages that |
21 |
> they should uninstall those packages. This shall be done by having a |
22 |
> deprecation check for at least one major version (x.y) series of |
23 |
> releases before removal in the subsequent major version (x.z)." |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
As pointed out many times to you. kdebuild has nothing with do with |
27 |
Gentoo proper. I see no reason that it should concern the council at |
28 |
all. I do not intend to vote on this item and consider the matter EOF. |
29 |
|
30 |
If you continue to mail bomb the council list, it will be considered |
31 |
abuse. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
35 |
Gentoo Linux |