Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Torsten Veller <tove@g.o>
Subject: The slacker mark
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:51:12 +0200
As you know the by GLEP 39 council members are marked as slacker if they
(or their proxy) fail to show up for two consecutive meetings.

Being marked as slacker makes your council life much harder. While a
council member can miss every second meeting without consequences. A
slacker who "misses any further meeting (or their appointed proxy
doesn't show up), they lose their position and a new election is held to
replace that person. The newly elected council member gets a 'reduced'
term so that the yearly elections still elect a full group."

So this might be a problem since yesterday's meeting:
lu_zero wasn't there for the second time in a row. If we follow GLPE 39
he'll get the slacker mark.

We should clearify the "new election" part in time. I think this council
started in July 2008 and there will be many meetings that can be missed
in the next 9 month.

As there is already a replacement strategy for devs leaving the council
(take the next ranked candidate if the council agrees, else elect one)
one might think to use the same for a slacker missing any further
meeting. But that doesn't work as the slacker can be elected again:

"Council members who have previously been booted for excessive slacking
may stand for future elections, including the election for their
replacement. They should, however, justify their slackerness, and should
expect to have it pointed out if they don't do so themselves."

Ideas?


Replies:
Re: The slacker mark
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: The slacker mark
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
EAPI 2 Approval Process
Next by thread:
Re: The slacker mark
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI 2 Approval Process
Next by date:
Re: The slacker mark


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.