Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-council
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-council@g.o
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:37:55 -0800
On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan     , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Discuss on-list before meeting
> > ---------------------------------------
> > - Council meta stuff (-council)
> >   - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum?
> >   - Should we have 2-year staggered terms?
> 
> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size.

What is your reasoning for this?

> I dislike the idea of stretched 2-year terms, instead I prefer having 
> 1-year staggered terms (voting every 6 months and replace 3 or 4 
> council members). This would allow to put open council slots into the 
> next election, we wouldn't need to hold extra elections for open slots 
> then.

As I mentioned on the -council voting thread, I am concerned about a 
constant influx of new members every 6 months making it very difficult 
to make any progress. Do you think that won't be a problem? If so, what 
makes you think that?

> Anyways, this is something we can discuss - but as a change to the
> voting procedure most likely does change or extend what's written down
> in GLEP 39 I'd like to see a election on those changes.

I'm assuming you mean a vote by all Gentoo devs, since an election 
generally involves voting for a person rather than a policy.

Just as a point of reference, the council has voted to change GLEP 39 in 
the past. I definitely feel that we need to hold this discussion 
publicly and get input from everyone. I think the council should then 
take all this input into consideration and vote upon it.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Attachment:
pgpFtSsemL8as.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
-- Tobias Scherbaum
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-council: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Voting procedure
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Voting procedure
Next by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.