1.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2008.05.20 21:31, Donnie Berkholz wrote:

[snip]

> To get some movement here, I'd like to get a concrete response from
> the council in this thread for how we should proceed. Here's some 
> options that have been mentioned:
> 
>   1) Have an election now;

After a week, I don't see how the council can do anything else.

> 
>   2) Hold a 1-week vote asking all devs whether we should have
> elections;

A vote about a vote seems like wasting time if you don't get the answer 
you want.
 
>   3) Say that last week's nonmeeting didn't count for any of these 
>      reasons: it was (a) poorly announced, (b) not voted on by a
> council 
>      majority or (c) not a regularly scheduled meeting; or

Too late.

> 
>   4) Something else. (What?)
> 
> Which one do you prefer?

Whatever you do you will upset someone. Its only 6 weeks until the 
normal election process kicks off anyway, so may as well go for it 
early and add 'fix GLEP 39' to your manifestos.

> 
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> -- 
> gentoo-council@g.o mailing list
> 
 
I hope you all stand again. Its the GLEP that's broken, not the council 
but to gain a clear mandate to fix it, it looks like you have to go to 
the electorate.

- -- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon) a member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
treecleaners
trustees
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgzPEAACgkQTE4/y7nJvauhYwCePNPvZZuTbho17H7lE68FLsaj
c0oAmwafhhiOGItXWa5p/aNLgq7LCHCL
=19r9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-council@g.o mailing list